Short answer: Andy Gipson and Philip Gunn are clearly declared candidates right now, and the rest of this page separates real contenders from thinner rumor so readers do not have to guess which names matter.
This is the part most candidate roundups usually mangle once announcement season starts.
Andy Gipson and Philip Gunn are formally in, which means the field is now in a real launch phase rather than a frozen maybe-list.
The most credible undeclared names now remain Delbert Hosemann, Lynn Fitch, and Shad White. Gunn no longer belongs in that bucket.
Michael Watson publicly confirmed a lieutenant-governor run, not a governor run, which makes the governor field cleaner than it looked a month ago.
That matters because field-shape accuracy is authority. Sloppy maybe-candidate lists are cheap. A cleaner map is more useful, especially once Philip Gunn has moved into the declared column.
If you want the broader read, go from this page to State of the race, then the launch-season analysis, then Sources.
Those pages answer the field, the why-now case for launch season, and the reporting trail without forcing readers to piece it together from rumor scraps.
People who have formally entered the race.
Why here: Formal campaign launch
Mississippi Commissioner of Agriculture and Commerce. First major candidate to officially announce a 2027 run.
Why here: Officially launched his gubernatorial campaign at an April 14 event in Clinton, making him the second major Republican to formally enter.
Former House speaker who moved from expected-entry chatter into the declared field with an April 14 campaign kickoff focused on taxes, jobs, infrastructure, health care, and his legislative record.
Unannounced figures with real statewide standing, money, organization, or direct public signals that make a run plausible.
Why here: Publicly said he expects to run and is still using the 2026 session end to frame governing wins.
Lieutenant governor with statewide name ID, money, and institutional reach. He publicly said in 2025 that he expects to run for governor, and his April 2026 session-end messaging on teacher pay, Medicaid pressure, and PERS kept him looking like a real potential candidate rather than idle chatter.
Why here: Credible statewide contender with major cash on hand
Attorney general with one of the strongest early fundraising positions in the field. She is still unannounced, but repeated field reporting treats her as a serious possible entrant.
Why here: Long-running statewide positioning and top-tier fundraising
State auditor who moved earliest among the major Republican names and has been openly positioned in 2027 field coverage as a would-be gubernatorial contender.
Why here: Frequently included in serious open-seat bench chatter
House speaker with leadership stature and a sizable campaign account. He has not taken visible public steps toward a run, but he still belongs in the credible-contender set rather than the rumor bin.
Why here: Still the clearest Democratic possibility
Democratic nominee for governor in 2023 and former Public Service Commissioner. He said after that loss that he was not walking off the political stage, keeping him as the most credible Democratic possibility even without a relaunch.
Names worth noting because there is some real smoke, but not enough yet to treat them like core contenders.
Why here: Confirmed lieutenant-governor bid, not a governor run
Secretary of state who said in March 2026 that he will not seek another term and will be on the ballot for higher office, then publicly confirmed on April 7 that he is running for lieutenant governor. He no longer belongs in the site’s core governor-contender tier.
Why here: Public moves are real, but the candidacy is still unformed
Southern Tire Mart executive whose PAC launch and public conversations about the race make him worth tracking. For now he fits better as a watchlist name than a core contender because there is still no campaign structure, filing move, or office-seeking declaration.
These names show up in operative talk or bench-speculation coverage, but the evidence is too thin to treat them as real contenders. They are listed here so readers can see the chatter without mistaking it for a field move.
Why here: Shows up in field chatter, but without current public steps toward a run
Former congressman whose name has been included in deep-bench reporting around the GOP field. There is not enough concrete movement to treat him as more than a long-shot mention right now.
Why here: Discussed as a dark horse, but not backed by any visible 2027 machinery
Congressman occasionally floated by operatives as a possible dark horse. That is enough to note, not enough to rank him with candidates who are signaling, organizing, or stockpiling for this race.
Why here: Plausible on paper, but still mostly an if-this-then-that conversation
State treasurer whose name appears in speculative scenario coverage because he has statewide office and personal resources. The current case is conditional bench talk, not a visible governor campaign in formation.
Important names shaping the race even if they cannot run again.
Why here: Included only for context
Incumbent governor. Important to the story, but barred from re-election in 2027 by term limits.
